Tribunal should take judicial notice of childcare disparity (Dobson v North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust)

The ‘childcare disparity’ (ie the fact women bear a greater childcare responsibility than men) is so well known in the context of indirect sex discrimination claims, and has so often been the subject of judicial notice in previous cases, that it is incumbent on an employment tribunal to take notice of it in the circumstances of an indirect sex discrimination relating to a requirement to work flexibly including at weekends, according to the EAT.

Dobson v North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Working Families (Intervenor) ( UKEAT/0220/19/LA)

What are the practical implications of this case?

This judgment provides a helpful reminder of the approach to be taken by employment tribunals when considering indirect sex discrimination claims, in particular in respect of:

  • identifying the correct ‘pool’ for comparison of disparate impact between men and women, and
  • proving group disadvantage

The EAT explains that the ‘childcare disparity’ has been recognised in many previous authorities and that those authorities still hold good because — whilst things might have progressed somewhat in that men do now bear a greater proportion of child caring responsibilities than they did decades ago — the position is still far from equal.

The fact that tribunals should take judicial notice of the ‘childcare disparity’ makes it easier for women to establish group disadvantage. It means that they will not have to provide their own supporting evidence of that matter when pursuing claims of indirect sex discrimination in circumstances where factors relating to childcare put them at a disadvantage, eg if the provision, criterion or practice (PCP) applied by the employer requires night working or changing shift patterns.

Case details

  • Court: Employment Appeal Tribunal
  • Tribunal Panel: The Honourable Mr Justice Choudhury (President), Ms Branney, Miss Wilson CBE
  • Date: 22 June 2021

Contact Us

Please contact us for a free, initial telephone consultation with a barrister.

020 7459 4619

    Contact Us





    Latest News

    FCA issues policy statement with guidance on non-financial misconduct

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published Policy statement PS25/23: Tackling non‑financial misconduct in financial services, following amendment of the Code of Conduct (COCON) and the Fit and Proper test for Employees and Senior Personnel (FIT) sourcebooks. The policy statement contains final guidance on serious non-financial misconduct (NFM) in the financial services sector, and aims… >>

    19 December 2025

    Employment Tribunals launch 18 explainer videos for unrepresented parties

    The President of Employment Tribunals (England & Wales), Judge Barry Clarke, has announced the launch of 18 explainer videos on YouTube aimed at improving access to justice by clarifying tribunal procedures and complex employment law for unrepresented parties. The initiative also seeks to help litigants present focused claims and responses, reducing case management time. This… >>

    12 December 2025

    Non-binary NHS worker loses claim over misgendering

    In Lockwood v Cheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust (ET case numbers: 2401211/2024, 2407178/2024), an employment tribunal has rejected a non-binary National Health Service (NHS) worker’s complaint over repeated misgendering at work, ruling that protections under equality laws did not apply. Judge Nicky Benson ruled that Haech Lockwood, a Cheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust… >>

    5 December 2025