EAT overturns strike-out order

In McMahon v AXA ICAS [2025] EAT 8, the EAT faced a number of issues on appeal around the payment due from a deduction of wages as well as a disability discrimination claim which was struck out by the employment tribunal. The respondent also cross-appealed a decision on deduction of wages, arguing that there was no contractual obligation to pay a Permanent Health Insurance (PHI) benefit, to which the claimant had been entitled during employment, and it was only required to maintain an insurance policy. The EAT dismissed the cross-appeal and the majority of the appeal in relation to the alleged deductions and the definition of earnings. The EAT found that:

• the tribunal had been correct in its determination of what counted as ‘normal earnings’ for the calculation of PHI, however it had erred in the application of the 5% annual increase to which the claimant was entitled. This would however be resolved at a remedy hearing

• the claimant had a contractual entitlement to the payments under the PHI scheme, which on proper construction of the contractual documents between the two parties, was owed by the respondent to the claimant rather than a simple obligation to maintain a policy of insurance

• the tribunal had erred by striking out the disability discrimination claim on the basis that the passage of time had meant that a fair trial on the issues was no longer possible without full consideration of the factors set out by Simler J in Daly v Northumberland and Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (2014) (2014) UKEAT/0306/14. The failure by the tribunal to properly evaluate the evidence or allow the claimant to expand on the specifics of the claim prior to the strike-out decision made it unfair.

Contact Us

Please contact us for a free, initial telephone consultation with a barrister.

020 7459 4619

    Contact Us





    Latest News

    FCA issues policy statement with guidance on non-financial misconduct

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published Policy statement PS25/23: Tackling non‑financial misconduct in financial services, following amendment of the Code of Conduct (COCON) and the Fit and Proper test for Employees and Senior Personnel (FIT) sourcebooks. The policy statement contains final guidance on serious non-financial misconduct (NFM) in the financial services sector, and aims… >>

    19 December 2025

    Employment Tribunals launch 18 explainer videos for unrepresented parties

    The President of Employment Tribunals (England & Wales), Judge Barry Clarke, has announced the launch of 18 explainer videos on YouTube aimed at improving access to justice by clarifying tribunal procedures and complex employment law for unrepresented parties. The initiative also seeks to help litigants present focused claims and responses, reducing case management time. This… >>

    12 December 2025

    Non-binary NHS worker loses claim over misgendering

    In Lockwood v Cheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust (ET case numbers: 2401211/2024, 2407178/2024), an employment tribunal has rejected a non-binary National Health Service (NHS) worker’s complaint over repeated misgendering at work, ruling that protections under equality laws did not apply. Judge Nicky Benson ruled that Haech Lockwood, a Cheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust… >>

    5 December 2025