Tribunal should determine when employee fell within territorial scope of GB law ((1) Partners Group (UK) Ltd, (2) Partners Group (USA) Inc v Mulumba)

In cases with foreign elements where there is a question as to whether a claim falls within the territorial scope of British employment law, it is an error of law for the tribunal not to identify whether, and, if so at what point in time, the claimant had sufficient connection with Great Britain and British… >>

Treasury releases public sector exit payments guidance on special severance payment approval process

HM Treasury has published guidance on the criteria which public sector employers should consider before proposing the use of a special severance payment. These are payments to terminated employees that do not correspond to any contractual or statutory right, including payments reached under a settlement agreement, the outstanding value of unclaimed employee benefits, write-offs of… >>

Worker status does not require minimum obligation on both parties (Nursing and Midwifery Council v Somerville)

When considering whether an individual has the status of a ‘worker’ for the purpose of various statutory rights, e.g., to holiday pay, there is no need for there to be an irreducible minimum of obligation on both parties, i.e., for there to be an obligation on a putative worker to accept and perform some minimum… >>

Constructive dismissal when there is a fundamental health and safety breach (Flatman v Essex County Council)

Where the actions of an employer amount to a fundamental breach of contract, nothing that the employer does after that point can cure that breach. Provided that the employee does not affirm the contract and waive the breach, it remains open to the employee to accept that breach and claim constructive dismissal. When considering whether… >>

No direct sex discrimination where non-payment of allowance was due to ‘absence’ not ‘maternity absence’ (Commissioner of City of London Police v Geldart)

A failure to pay an allowance due to a mistaken belief that the allowance constituted ‘pay’ and was therefore not payable during the latter part of a police constable’s maternity leave, did not amount to direct sex discrimination. It was the claimant’s unavailability for work that was the reason for non-payment and the fact that… >>

Out of time discriminatory acts that contribute to a last straw constructive dismissal (De Lacey v Wechseln t/a The Andrew Hill Salon)

Where discriminatory acts, that appear to be well outside tribunal time limits, form part of a chain of events that lead up to a ‘last straw’ constructive dismissal, and those acts sufficiently influenced the overall repudiatory breach in response to which the employee ultimately resigned, then a claim for discriminatory constructive dismissal may still be… >>

Paying enhanced adoption pay alongside lower shared parental pay is not direct discrimination (Price v Powys County Council)

Where an employer pays adoption pay at an enhanced rate but pays shared parental pay to all employees (male or female) at a lower rate (e.g., at the statutory rate), that will not amount to direct sex discrimination, according to the EAT. Price v Powys County Council (UKEAT/0133/20/LA) What are the practical implications of this… >>