Blog

Categories

Teacher fails to prove trans whistleblowing led to dismissal

An employment tribunal (ET) has dismissed a teacher’s claim that she lost her job after blowing the whistle during a feud over the handling of a child who wished to change gender. Employment Judge Peter McTigue said in a decision published 23 May 2025 that Nottinghamshire County Council in central England did not unfairly dismiss… >>

6 June 2025

Exam invigilator wins worker status claim in pay dispute

In Shanks v Scottish Qualifications Authority, Case Number 8001728/2024, a Scottish employment tribunal has ruled that exam invigilators for the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) enjoy worker status and deserve holiday pay, rejecting arguments that their situation was analogous to Deliveroo riders.

2 June 2025

Court of Appeal dismisses whistleblowing detriment claims against external HR consultants

In Handa v Station Hotel [2025] EAT 62, the EAT (HHJ Auerbach sitting alone) considered an appeal against a decision of the employment tribunal to strike out the claimant’s claims of detriment on grounds of whistleblowing (protected disclosure) against the fourth and fifth respondents, both external HR consultants. The fourth respondent had investigated grievances raised… >>

9 May 2025

ET makes principled error of law in refusing application to include victimisation claim

In Dethling v The Metropolitan Police Service [2025] EAT 58, the claimant attempted to amend her existing complaints of disability, race and sex discrimination to include a complaint of victimisation following a letter sent by her former employer’s solicitors warning of the imminent filing of a theft report over her warrant card, which she had… >>

2 May 2025

EAT examines benchmark for costs orders in discrimination claims (Madu v Loughborough College)

Special consideration should be given to the unique circumstances and difficulties involved in bringing discrimination claim when determining whether to award costs under the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (ET Rules 2024), particularly where the claimant is a litigant in person (LiP) or was at the time the claim was brought, according to the EAT… >>

25 April 2025

Supreme Court holds that ‘sex’ means ‘biological sex’

In For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16, the Supreme Court held that the words ‘sex’, ‘woman’ and ‘man’ in sections 11 and 212(1) of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) mean biological sex, biological woman and biological man, with the effect that: • a trans man with a gender recognition… >>

22 April 2025