Claim for quantum meruit cannot be brought as wages deductions claim (Abellio East Midlands Ltd v Thomas)

A claim for a quantum meruit payment (i.e., as much as is deserved) cannot be brought as a claim of unlawful deductions from wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996, according to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).

Abellio East Midlands Ltd v Thomas [2022] EAT 20, (EA-2020-000935-OO)

What are the practical implications of this judgment?

This judgment is a reminder that employment tribunals do not have jurisdiction to hear all types of claim relating to a loss of pay. Parties should consider carefully whether a claim relating to a loss of pay fulfils all of the relevant statutory criteria so that it can be brought in an employment tribunal as a claim for unlawful deductions from wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) or whether it needs to be brought in a County Court or High Court as a claim for a breach of contract or for a quantum meruit. It should be noted that the rules (e.g., in relation to pleading, time limits and costs) are different if the claim is brought in a court rather than a tribunal.

This judgment also clarifies that, in a case such as this, in which the claimant has a contract of employment but is claiming for payment in respect of additional work, the question is whether the work done by the claimant fell outside the scope of his existing contract. Based on the circumstances of this case, the EAT held that the work done by the claimant did fall outside of the scope of his existing contract and he was therefore entitled to a quantum meruit (albeit he would have to bring his claim in a County Court).

Case details

  • Court: Employment Appeal Tribunal
  • Judge: Michael Ford QC
  • Date of judgment: 28 January 2022

 

Contact Us

Please contact us for a free, initial telephone consultation with a barrister.

020 7459 4619

    Contact Us





    Latest News

    FCA issues policy statement with guidance on non-financial misconduct

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published Policy statement PS25/23: Tackling non‑financial misconduct in financial services, following amendment of the Code of Conduct (COCON) and the Fit and Proper test for Employees and Senior Personnel (FIT) sourcebooks. The policy statement contains final guidance on serious non-financial misconduct (NFM) in the financial services sector, and aims… >>

    19 December 2025

    Employment Tribunals launch 18 explainer videos for unrepresented parties

    The President of Employment Tribunals (England & Wales), Judge Barry Clarke, has announced the launch of 18 explainer videos on YouTube aimed at improving access to justice by clarifying tribunal procedures and complex employment law for unrepresented parties. The initiative also seeks to help litigants present focused claims and responses, reducing case management time. This… >>

    12 December 2025

    Non-binary NHS worker loses claim over misgendering

    In Lockwood v Cheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust (ET case numbers: 2401211/2024, 2407178/2024), an employment tribunal has rejected a non-binary National Health Service (NHS) worker’s complaint over repeated misgendering at work, ruling that protections under equality laws did not apply. Judge Nicky Benson ruled that Haech Lockwood, a Cheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust… >>

    5 December 2025