Knowledge during appeal process not relevant to whether dismissal discriminatory (Stott v Ralli Ltd)

In cases alleging discrimination, the process of an appeal against a dismissal is treated as being separate from the decision to dismiss, so that when considering whether an employer had knowledge of an employee’s disability at the time of dismissal (for the purpose of a disability discrimination claim based on the dismissal) it is not necessary to consider the employer’s knowledge during the appeal process, according to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).

Stott v Ralli Ltd (EA-2019-000772-VP)

What are the practical implications of this judgment?

This judgment clarifies that unlike unfair dismissal cases, in which the fairness of a dismissal must take into account all the circumstances up to and including an appeal, in a discrimination claim whether a dismissal and the outcome of an appeal against that dismissal are discriminatory must be treated as separate issues. Accordingly:

  • if a claimant wishes to make a claim of discrimination in relation to the appeal then they must expressly do so or else there is no need for the employment tribunal to make a decision on it
  • the proposition that the decision to dismiss was discriminatory, and the proposition that the decision on an appeal was discriminatory, are distinct propositions which will not necessarily yield the same answer, and
  • in a disability discrimination claim, the question of the employer’s knowledge of the disability must be dealt with by reference only to the dismissal decision (and not any later appeal process)

Case details

  • Court: Employment Appeal Tribunal
  • Judge: His Honour Judge Auerbach
  • Date of judgment: 19 October 2021

Contact Us

Please contact us for a free, initial telephone consultation with a barrister.

020 7459 4619

    Contact Us





    Latest News

    FCA issues policy statement with guidance on non-financial misconduct

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published Policy statement PS25/23: Tackling non‑financial misconduct in financial services, following amendment of the Code of Conduct (COCON) and the Fit and Proper test for Employees and Senior Personnel (FIT) sourcebooks. The policy statement contains final guidance on serious non-financial misconduct (NFM) in the financial services sector, and aims… >>

    19 December 2025

    Employment Tribunals launch 18 explainer videos for unrepresented parties

    The President of Employment Tribunals (England & Wales), Judge Barry Clarke, has announced the launch of 18 explainer videos on YouTube aimed at improving access to justice by clarifying tribunal procedures and complex employment law for unrepresented parties. The initiative also seeks to help litigants present focused claims and responses, reducing case management time. This… >>

    12 December 2025

    Non-binary NHS worker loses claim over misgendering

    In Lockwood v Cheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust (ET case numbers: 2401211/2024, 2407178/2024), an employment tribunal has rejected a non-binary National Health Service (NHS) worker’s complaint over repeated misgendering at work, ruling that protections under equality laws did not apply. Judge Nicky Benson ruled that Haech Lockwood, a Cheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust… >>

    5 December 2025