Lack of interim relief in discrimination claims is lawful (Steer v Stormsure Ltd)

The inability of a claimant to obtain interim relief from the employment tribunal in a dismissal claim alleging sex discrimination and victimisation does not breach Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), according to the Court of Appeal.

Steer v Stormsure Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 887 

What are the practical implications of this case?

This case raises an interesting point of law, namely whether the lack of availability of interim relief in claims of discrimination involving a dismissal — when such relief is available in claims such as whistleblowing dismissals — is in breach of Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) of the European Convention on Human Rights, when read alongside Articles 6 (right to a fair trial) or 8 (right to respect for private and family life). The Court of Appeal, disagreeing with the earlier judgment of the EAT, found that the differences in available remedies did not breach Article 14 because:

  • the fact that interim relief is available to a dismissed whistleblower but not to a claimant alleging sex discrimination is not discrimination on the grounds of sex (interim relief not being available to men or women claiming discrimination or claimants relying on other protected characteristics)
  • neither was it discrimination on the grounds of ‘other status’, since being a litigant in one type of case (e.g. a discrimination claim) is not a status
  • the remedies available in a sex discrimination claim, taken as a whole, are not in any event less favourable to the claimant than those available to a dismissed whistleblower, and
  • even if they were, the difference in treatment by the legislature has been shown to be justified

Since this judgment finds that the status quo is compatible with obligations under the ECHR, there are no changes (as might have been anticipated following the EAT’s earlier decision) for those litigating discrimination claims.

Case details

  • Court: Court of Appeal
  • Judges: Lord Justice Bean, Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing, Lord Justice Warby
  • Date: 11 June 2021

Contact Us

Please contact us for a free, initial telephone consultation with a barrister.

020 7459 4619

    Contact Us





    Latest News

    FCA issues policy statement with guidance on non-financial misconduct

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published Policy statement PS25/23: Tackling non‑financial misconduct in financial services, following amendment of the Code of Conduct (COCON) and the Fit and Proper test for Employees and Senior Personnel (FIT) sourcebooks. The policy statement contains final guidance on serious non-financial misconduct (NFM) in the financial services sector, and aims… >>

    19 December 2025

    Employment Tribunals launch 18 explainer videos for unrepresented parties

    The President of Employment Tribunals (England & Wales), Judge Barry Clarke, has announced the launch of 18 explainer videos on YouTube aimed at improving access to justice by clarifying tribunal procedures and complex employment law for unrepresented parties. The initiative also seeks to help litigants present focused claims and responses, reducing case management time. This… >>

    12 December 2025

    Non-binary NHS worker loses claim over misgendering

    In Lockwood v Cheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust (ET case numbers: 2401211/2024, 2407178/2024), an employment tribunal has rejected a non-binary National Health Service (NHS) worker’s complaint over repeated misgendering at work, ruling that protections under equality laws did not apply. Judge Nicky Benson ruled that Haech Lockwood, a Cheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust… >>

    5 December 2025