Employment tribunal can order disclosure against a party who is not in Great Britain (Sarnoff v YZ)

There is no geographical restriction on an employment tribunal’s power to order disclosure against a party to the proceedings. This is because the tribunal’s power to order disclosure against a party derives from its general case management powers set out in Rule 29 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure and not under Rule 31, which applies only in respect of orders for disclosure against non-parties, according to the Court of Appeal.

Sarnoff v YZ [2021] EWCA Civ 26

What are the practical implications of this case?

It is commonplace for employment tribunals to make orders for disclosure against parties without making enquiries about their whereabouts, so the outcome of this appeal will maintain rather than cause any change to that practice.

Interestingly, despite the employment tribunal, the EAT and the Court of Appeal all reaching the same outcome as to the nature of the tribunal’s power in respect of disclosure, each of them reached that conclusion through different reasoning.

Due to the difficulties involved in grappling with the reference in Rule 31 to ordering disclosure against ‘any person in Great Britain’ the Court of Appeal ultimately decided that:

  • the tribunal’s general power to order disclosure against parties was under Rule 29 which has no geographical limits; and
  • the more restricted power in Rule 31 to be able to order disclosure against any person in Great Britain applies only in respect of orders made against non-parties.

Court details

  • Court: Court of Appeal
  • Judges: Lord Justice Underhill, Lord Justice Bean and Lord Justice Phillips
  • Date: 15 January 2021

Contact Us

Please contact us for a free, initial telephone consultation with a barrister.

020 7459 4619

    Contact Us





    Latest News

    FCA issues policy statement with guidance on non-financial misconduct

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published Policy statement PS25/23: Tackling non‑financial misconduct in financial services, following amendment of the Code of Conduct (COCON) and the Fit and Proper test for Employees and Senior Personnel (FIT) sourcebooks. The policy statement contains final guidance on serious non-financial misconduct (NFM) in the financial services sector, and aims… >>

    19 December 2025

    Employment Tribunals launch 18 explainer videos for unrepresented parties

    The President of Employment Tribunals (England & Wales), Judge Barry Clarke, has announced the launch of 18 explainer videos on YouTube aimed at improving access to justice by clarifying tribunal procedures and complex employment law for unrepresented parties. The initiative also seeks to help litigants present focused claims and responses, reducing case management time. This… >>

    12 December 2025

    Non-binary NHS worker loses claim over misgendering

    In Lockwood v Cheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust (ET case numbers: 2401211/2024, 2407178/2024), an employment tribunal has rejected a non-binary National Health Service (NHS) worker’s complaint over repeated misgendering at work, ruling that protections under equality laws did not apply. Judge Nicky Benson ruled that Haech Lockwood, a Cheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust… >>

    5 December 2025